Table 4 Logistic regression to identify high engagement in harm reduction behaviors in nature party attendees (N = 1206)
Variable | Value | OR | 95% C.I. for | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||
Socio-demographics | ||||
Gender | Women-1, Men-0 | 1.13 | 0.84 | 1.50 |
Age group | 26–31-1, 18–25-0 | 0.85 | 0.58 | 1.24 |
32–60-1, 18–25-0 | 0.73 | 0.47 | 1.14 | |
Marital status | Married-1, Single-0 | 1.84 | 0.97 | 3.48 |
Divorced/separated-1, Single-0 | 2.22*** | 1.49 | 3.32 | |
Education | Diploma-1, High school-0 | 1.24 | 0.79 | 1.96 |
BA student-1, High school-0 | 0.89 | 0.59 | 1.34 | |
BA-1, High school-0 | 1.21 | 0.79 | 1.87 | |
MA-1, High school-0 | 1.23 | 0.70 | 2.16 | |
Nagelkerke R2 = 0.035 | ||||
Attitudes toward harm reduction | ||||
Positive attitudes | Little-1, No-0 | 2.15*** | 1.35 | 3.43 |
Medium-1, No-0 | 3.36*** | 2.18 | 5.17 | |
Lots-1, No-0 | 4.06*** | 2.62 | 6.29 | |
Nagelkerke R2 = 0.062 | ||||
Attitudes toward drug testing kits | ||||
Positive attitudes | Little-1, No-0 | 1.94** | 1.21 | 3.11 |
Medium-1, No-0 | 2.52*** | 1.62 | 3.92 | |
Lots-1, No-0 | 4.53*** | 2.97 | 6.90 | |
Nagelkerke R2 = 0.074 | ||||
Substances use at nature parties in the past year | ||||
Cannabis | Yes-1, No-0 | 1.34 | 0.97 | 1.84 |
Alcohol | Yes-1, No-0 | 0.60*** | 0.45 | 0.81 |
MDMA | Yes-1, No-0 | 1.63** | 1.19 | 2.23 |
L.S.D | Yes-1, No-0 | 1.41* | 1.03 | 1.94 |
Mushrooms/psilocybin | Yes-1, No-0 | 0.77 | 0.54 | 1.09 |
Cocaine | Yes-1, No-0 | 0.58* | 0.38 | 0.89 |
Ketamine | Yes-1, No-0 | 0.94 | 0.63 | 1.39 |
Laughing gas/nitrous oxide | Yes-1, No-0 | 0.27* | 0.08 | 0.90 |
Nagelkerke R2 = 0.055 | ||||