From: A drug use survey among clients of harm reduction sites across British Columbia, Canada, 2012
Description | Feedback | |
---|---|---|
Part 1 | Consisted of 7 statements to be rated on a Likert scale: | 1. We would be willing to do the survey again next year (once per year). |
☐ Strongly agree | 2. We would consider doing the survey twice per year. | |
☐ Agree | ||
☐ Neutral | 3. The questions were easy to understand and answer. | |
☐ Disagree | ||
☐ Strongly disagree | 4. The staff and peers involved with the survey felt it was valuable information. | |
5. The administration of the survey to clients was minimally disruptive to our regular activities. | ||
6. We estimate the decline/refusal rate was within acceptable limits (under 15%). | ||
7. Administration of the survey to clients by staff or peers is preferred over self-administration. | ||
Part 2 | Consisted of three open-ended statements for completion | 1. What went well for us |
2. What did not go so well | ||
3. Suggestions for improvement | ||
Part 3 | Consisted of contacting select staff and peers who had administered the survey for feedback on wording of individual questions, how questions were received by clients, and suggestions for improvement |