Skip to main content

Table 7 Factors significantly associated with an HCV positive (HCV+) test in univariate tests and binary logistic regression (forward stepwise selection)

From: Associating conditional cash transfer to universal access to treatment could be the solution to the HCV epidemic among drug users (DUs)

HCV+

% HCV+

% total

Sig

Odds ratio

95% CI odds ratio

Lower

Upper

Injection

  

< 0.0001

22.250

5.294

93.518

 Yes

33.3

66.3

    

 No

3.3

33.7

    

NSS

  

< 0.0001

15.579

7.205

33.688

 Yes

48.1

40.3

    

 No

5.6

59.7

    

Craving

  

< 0.0001

9.26

4.83

4.83–17.74

 Yes

49.4

33.2

    

 No

9.5

66.6

    

Police

  

< 0.0001

3.519

1.858

6.663

 Yes

36.5

44.6

    

 No

14.1

55.2

    

SDU or GP

  

< 0.0001

0.191

0.100

0.366

 Yes

29.9

69.8

    

 No

6.2

30.2

    

OST

  

< 0.0001

4.959

2.444

10.060

 Yes

29.8

67.8

    

 No

8.1

32.2

    

SDU

  

< 0.0001

3.420

1.814

6.450

 Yes

42.1

21.3

    

 No

17.5

78.7

    

Prison

  

0.009

2.279

1.212

4.274

 Yes

29.9

57.4

    

 No

15.7

42.6

    

Logistic regression

B

Wald

Sig

Odds ratio

95% CI odds ratio

Lower

Upper

 NSS

0.108

17.440

< 0.0001

1.115

1.080

1.174

 Drug use

− 2.623

33.403

< 0.0001

0.73

0.30

0.177

 Police

− 1.190

8.310

0.004

0.323

0.150

0.697

 Constant

− 1.939

8.310

0.002

   
  1. Hosmer and Lemeshow test, 0.991; CC—HCV+, 51.8%; HCV−,90.3%; all, 81%
  2. Injection history of injection, NSS needle and syringe sharing, Craving NSS at a time of craving, Police police crackdown on injections, SDU service for drug users, GP medical practice of a general practitioner, OST opiate substitution therapy, Drug treatment center attending SDU or GP, Drug use duration of drug use, CC correctly classified
  3. Logistic regression odds ratios: NSS absent/present, police: absent/present, injection: NSS− and no injection/NSS+, craving: injection at a time of craving−/injection at a time of craving+ (267 cases: exclusion of HCV+ DUs)